I had posted this to the mailing list originally after a discussion with Christopher at the Accumulo Summit hack-a-thon and because I wanted to get into the release process to help out.
Josh, I still wouldn't mind getting together 1.6.1 if that's okay with you. If nothing else, it would get someone else following the procedures and able to do the release. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's exactly my plan, Christopher. Keith has been the man working on a > fix for ACCUMULO-1628 which is what I've been spinning on to get 1.5.2 out > the door. I want to spend a little time today looking at his patch to > understand the fix and run some tests myself. Hopefully John can retest the > patch as well since he had an environment that could reproduce the bug. > > Right after we get 1.5.2, I'm happy to work on 1.6.1 as well. > > - Josh > > > On 9/10/14, 10:04 AM, Christopher wrote: > >> Because of ACCUMULO-2988 (upgrade path from 1.4.x --> 1.6.y, y >= 1), I'm >> hoping we can revisit this soon. Maybe get 1.5.2 out the door, followed by >> 1.6.1 right away. >> >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I was thinking the same thing, but I also haven't made any strides >>>> >>> towards >>> >>>> getting 1.5.2 closer to happening (as I said I'd try to do). >>>> >>>> I still lack "physical" resources to do the week-long testing as our >>>> guidelines currently force us to do. I still think this testing is >>>> excessive if we're actually releasing bug-fixes, but it does >>>> >>> differentiate >>> >>>> us from other communities. >>>> >>>> >>> I want to run some CI test because of the changes I made w/ walog. I can >>> run the test, but I would like to do that as late as possible. Just let >>> me know when you are thinking of cutting a release. >>> >>> Also, I would like to get 2827 in for the release. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm really not sure how to approach this which is really why I've been >>>> stalling on it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/19/14, 7:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to see 1.5.2 released first, just in case there are issues we >>>>> discover during that process that need to be addressed. Also, I think >>>>> it >>>>> would be useful to resolve the discussion surrounding upgrades[1] >>>>> before >>>>> releasing. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: >>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/accumulo-dev/ >>>>> 201406.mbox/%3CCAGHyZ6LFuwH%3DqGF9JYpitOY9yYDG- >>>>> sop9g6iq57VFPQRnzmyNQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to start getting a candidate together if there are no >>>>> >>>>>> objections. >>>>>> >>>>>> It looks like we have 65 resolved tickets with a fix version of 1.6.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>
