Sure that's fine, Corey. Happy to help coordinate things with you.
*Hopefully* it's not too painful :)
On 9/10/14, 10:43 AM, Corey Nolet wrote:
I had posted this to the mailing list originally after a discussion with
Christopher at the Accumulo Summit hack-a-thon and because I wanted to get
into the release process to help out.
Josh, I still wouldn't mind getting together 1.6.1 if that's okay with you.
If nothing else, it would get someone else following the procedures and
able to do the release.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
That's exactly my plan, Christopher. Keith has been the man working on a
fix for ACCUMULO-1628 which is what I've been spinning on to get 1.5.2 out
the door. I want to spend a little time today looking at his patch to
understand the fix and run some tests myself. Hopefully John can retest the
patch as well since he had an environment that could reproduce the bug.
Right after we get 1.5.2, I'm happy to work on 1.6.1 as well.
- Josh
On 9/10/14, 10:04 AM, Christopher wrote:
Because of ACCUMULO-2988 (upgrade path from 1.4.x --> 1.6.y, y >= 1), I'm
hoping we can revisit this soon. Maybe get 1.5.2 out the door, followed by
1.6.1 right away.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I was thinking the same thing, but I also haven't made any strides
towards
getting 1.5.2 closer to happening (as I said I'd try to do).
I still lack "physical" resources to do the week-long testing as our
guidelines currently force us to do. I still think this testing is
excessive if we're actually releasing bug-fixes, but it does
differentiate
us from other communities.
I want to run some CI test because of the changes I made w/ walog. I can
run the test, but I would like to do that as late as possible. Just let
me know when you are thinking of cutting a release.
Also, I would like to get 2827 in for the release.
I'm really not sure how to approach this which is really why I've been
stalling on it.
On 6/19/14, 7:18 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
I'd like to see 1.5.2 released first, just in case there are issues we
discover during that process that need to be addressed. Also, I think
it
would be useful to resolve the discussion surrounding upgrades[1]
before
releasing.
[1]:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/accumulo-dev/
201406.mbox/%3CCAGHyZ6LFuwH%3DqGF9JYpitOY9yYDG-
sop9g6iq57VFPQRnzmyNQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I'd like to start getting a candidate together if there are no
objections.
It looks like we have 65 resolved tickets with a fix version of 1.6.1.
