Sean, can you please provide a pointer to the discussion of race conditions in property updates?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > -1 > > This change alters our public API while not solving the underlying issue of > race conditions in property updates. > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Committers, this is a consensus vote on whether or not to include Jenna's >> patch for ACCUMULO-3176 to the 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT (master) branch. >> >> This patch improves the table creation API with the introduction of a >> NewTableConfiguration object (similar to the pattern for >> BatchWriterConfig), which allows us to be flexible on improving table >> creation options in the future without creating many overloaded methods (as >> the table creation API has been plagued by in the past). The main goal of >> the patch is to allow table properties to be set on a table at the time of >> creation, before any tablets are assigned, but it also lays the foundation >> for future table creation improvements. Creating initial table properties >> was already present in the RPC calls, but not exposed in the API. This can >> support a number of use cases. >> >> Since an objection was raised by Sean Busbey (and a veto expected), I've >> initiated this vote in lieu of applying the patch under lazy consensus so >> that any veto votes can be justified and addressed here. >> >> Note: there are a few bugs in the Mock implementation of this that I've >> fixed, as well as some minor deprecation warnings and javadoc improvements >> I'm adding, please apply your vote under the assumption that those will be >> fixed before it will be applied. >> >> Please vote in accordance with the bylaws for consensus voting. >> My vote is +1. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > > > > -- > Sean
