+1 My RW testing went well enough, and I didn't see failures until the cluster hung up.ACCUMULO-3818 is a test issue, and not a problem with accumulo.
I was able to build 1.7.0 from the source tarball. I'll continue to investigate the recoverLease issue. -Eric On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > In some of my testing on HDFS 2.6.0 and agitation, I believe leases > weren't being recovered until the datanode was restarted (which agitation > killed). Every time I jstack'ed the master, I saw it hung on the HDFS > recoverLease() method. I saw nothing that suggested a bug in Accumulo (a > nod towards Christopher's assessment). > > > Eric Newton wrote: > >> Can you quantify "Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS."? >> >> I think Keith and I are ok with the release. We're looking into our >> (shared) testing environment to figure out why Accumulo and HDFS are not >> getting along during recoveries. >> >> -Eric >> >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 72hr 3node CI verify w/ agitation just succeeded. >>> >>> org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts >>> REFERENCED=19706560041 >>> UNREFERENCED=29844289 >>> >>> Repeatedly ran into issues with HoldTime from HDFS (wrote a loop to just >>> restart the ingester). Some lease recoveries taking a long time in HDFS. >>> Nothing super impactful. >>> >>> I believe that wraps up all required testing. >>> >>> >>> Josh Elser wrote: >>> >>> 24hr CI just verified >>>> >>>> org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts >>>> REFERENCED=5754999773 >>>> UNREFERENCED=6000227 >>>> >>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>> >>>> 24hr RW on 3 nodes w/ agitation just finished positively. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Testing: All unit and integration tests are passing. Completed 3-day >>>>>> CI >>>>>> w/o agitation or verification. Completed 24hr RandomWalk w/o agitation >>>>>> on 3 nodes. 95% through 24hr CI and RW w/ agitation. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>
