I was trying to vote. On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:07 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was confused initially by the subject of this thread "+0", but now I > wonder... was this thread an attempt to respond to the [VOTE] thread > with a "+0" vote? If so, it does not appear that it worked... either > because the subject had changed, or because the mailing list itself > (or possibly your email client) messed with the mail headers for > threading. > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:48 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > For many ITs, you can also add: '-Dtimeout.factor=2' (or 3, or > whatever). > > This will increase the timeout threshold by the given multiplier, > > which can be helpful if you run on slower hardware (or your AV is > > interfering with performance, or whatever). > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:30 PM Jeffrey Zeiberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Thank you Mike. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:21 PM Mike Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Not sure if you have this but here is a fast way to just run one IT: > > > > mvn clean verify -Dit.test=RollWALPerformanceIT -Dtest=foo > -Dspotbugs.skip > > > > -Drat.skip -Dformatter.skip -Dcheckstyle.skip -Dmodernizer.skip > > > > -Dimpsort.skip -Dsortpom.skip -DfailIfNoTests=false > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:12 PM Mike Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Try running it again... a few times. :) That is a finicky test. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:07 PM Jeffrey Zeiberg < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> RollWALPerformanceIT timed out for me but does not do this on > master > > > > >> branch. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
