The VOTE passes with 8 (+1) votes, 6 binding and 0 (-1) votes.

Thanks everyone for the work testing the RC.  I am ending the vote for
1.10.0-rc2 but I will most likely need someone to take over the remaining
items for the release.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:12 PM Jeffrey Manno <jeffreymann...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes it did. Same procedure for both clusters.
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:08 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Jeff, did that local cluster use agitation?
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 13:06 Jeffrey Manno <jeffreymann...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Verification MR job on the local cluster here completed with :
> > >
> > > REFERENCED=6079512572
> > > UNREFERENCED=2000242
> > >
> > > I ran into a memory issue on my ec2 cluster but that seems to be only
> > > related to the hadoop side of things. I am trying to figure out a way
> > > around it so I can properly run the verification MR job on it.
> > >
> > > Based on the results from the local cluster, I can change my vote back
> to
> > > +1 but I will continue to work on the ec2 side just to be sure.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:16 PM Owens, Mark <jmow...@evoforge.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Given no data loss, I will also change my vote back to +1.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 11:17 AM
> > > > To: accumulo-dev <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.10.0-rc2
> > > >
> > > > That's good news. I'll also change my vote back to +1
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 11:04 Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:29 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I started investigating this today.  I quickly noticed two
> things.
> > > > > > First when I scanned the table for some of the data reported as
> > > > > > missing by the MR job it was there.  Second the range of the
> > > > > > supposed missing data covered the entire table.  Then I realized
> we
> > > > > > never stopped ingest, so during verification ingest was still
> > > > > > running.  This would cause data to report as missing because
> > mappers
> > > > > > read different parts of the table at different times.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was advising Karthick on how to run the test and I gave some
> > really
> > > > > > bad advice, I forgot to mention to stop ingest.   Sorry everyone,
> > > > > > please forgive my blunder.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I stopped ingest and started the verification job again.  It has
> > > > > > more data to verify than last time, there are 71B entries in the
> > > table
> > > > now.
> > > > > > I also enabled snappy compression of map output as a precaution
> to
> > > > > > ensure there is enough space.  Was planning on less data when
> > > > > > allocating the cluster, but I think there is enough space to run
> > the
> > > > > > job though.  The cluster has 9TB of 25TB used.  I'll report back
> > > > > > when the job finishes.
> > > > >
> > > > > The verification MR job completed w/ no undefined nodes.  Saw only
> > the
> > > > > following counts.  Therefore no data loss was detected.
> > > > >
> > > > > REFERENCED=70731300868
> > > > > UNREFERENCED=9002824
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on this I am changing my vote to +1
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:07 PM karthick rn
> > > > > > <karthick.narend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Keith and I tested the continuous ingest with agitation on 11
> > > > > > > nodes (9
> > > > > > > workers) for 24 hrs and noticed the following after running the
> > > > > MapReduce
> > > > > > > verify job. The "undefined" counter is greater than 0 may be
> > > > > > > indicating data loss.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts
> > > > > > >  REFERENCED=35470816664
> > > > > > > * UNDEFINED=707335949*
> > > > > > >  UNREFERENCED=715995424
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The cluster was setup using Muchos (
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/fluo-muchos)
> > > > > > > & following are the details
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  * 11 Azure VMs (Standard D8s)
> > > > > > >  * Managed Disk – 3 x 1024g per VM
> > > > > > >  * Hadoop 2.10.0
> > > > > > >  * Accumulo 1.10.0-rc2
> > > > > > >  * Java 8
> > > > > > >  * CentOS7.5
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Created the table 'ci' and split using the below commands  $
> > > > > > > accumulo org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.GenSplits 90 >
> > > > > splits.txt
> > > > > > >  $ accumulo shell -u root -p secret -e 'createtable ci -sf
> > > > splits.txt'
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Below is the agitator options used for the test nohup
> > > > > > > ./tserver-agitator.pl 1:10 1:10 1 3 > logs/tserver-ag.out 2>
> > > > > > > logs/tserver-ag.err &
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We will investigate the data loss and share our findings.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Karthick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 23:32, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Karthick and I are working together to run random walk and
> > > > > > > > continuous ingest on two clusters using this RC.  After
> > > > > > > > continuous ingest ran
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > 24 hrs we tried to start verification and ran into the
> > following
> > > > > > > > issue.  I plan to vote after the test completes, but wanted
> to
> > > > > > > > let anyone else running continuous ingest know about this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1695
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We also ran into another issue w/ the verification script
> > > > > > > > related to ZK 3.5 that we worked around w/ a hack (Karthick
> > > > > > > > copied the ZK jar from $ZK_HOME/lib to $ZK_HOME so the script
> > > > could find the jars :).
> > > > > > > > Need to open an issue about this too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:36 PM Mike Miller
> > > > > > > > <mmil...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Accumulo Developers,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo
> > > > 1.10.0.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Git Commit:
> > > > > > > > >     4d261254c3ac43a3bd13ce974e91ce4303a83998
> > > > > > > > > Branch:
> > > > > > > > >     1.10.0-rc2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created
> using:
> > > > > > > > >     git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.10.0' -s rel/1.10.0 \
> > > > > > > > >     4d261254c3ac43a3bd13ce974e91ce4303a83998
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Staging repo:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1
> > > > > 086
> > > > > > > > > Source (official release artifact):
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1
> > > > > 086/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.10.0/accumulo-1.10.0-src.tar.gz
> > > > > > > > > Binary:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1
> > > > > 086/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.10.0/accumulo-1.10.0-bin.tar.gz
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Append ".asc" to download the cryptographic signature for a
> > > > > > > > > given
> > > > > > > > artifact.
> > > > > > > > > (You can also append ".sha1" or ".md5" instead in order to
> > > > > > > > > verify
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > checksums
> > > > > > > > > generated by Maven to verify the integrity of the Nexus
> > > > > > > > > repository
> > > > > > > > staging
> > > > > > > > > area.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signing keys are available at
> > > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > (Expected fingerprint:
> > > > > > > > > 1914AF6FE2C53672C87CE1DADC8FFDC342894E89)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In addition to the tarballs and their signatures, the
> > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > checksum
> > > > > > > > > files will be added to the dist/release SVN area after
> > release:
> > > > > > > > > accumulo-1.10.0-src.tar.gz.sha512 will contain:
> > > > > > > > > SHA512 (accumulo-1.10.0-src.tar.gz) =
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > 81f2a8f8273e2bdfe46d6a807dc38276ee2937ced648829648b7750bfc22816c13d434
> > > > > 61d1b08c50a6957d78a999ae3109c93d2f31c7d8be116e91e0ea25f5c2
> > > > > > > > > accumulo-1.10.0-bin.tar.gz.sha512 will contain:
> > > > > > > > > SHA512 (accumulo-1.10.0-bin.tar.gz) =
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > 9d3023c8724069282035ed6dcb047f737c1c53dc05f7b15da2cfd941f51d1d77208924
> > > > > 96475430eb639f3a36c83f4eecc1942c0317c67d38dcf2061d06beb648
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Release notes (in progress) can be found at:
> > > > > > > > > https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-1.10.0/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Release testing instructions:
> > > > > > > > > https://accumulo.apache.org/contributor/verifying-release
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote one of:
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote
> > > > > against...
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > > > > > > > > ... these artifacts as the 1.10.0 release of Apache
> Accumulo.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This vote will remain open until at least Sun Aug 30
> 16:30:00
> > > > > > > > > UTC
> > > > > 2020.
> > > > > > > > > (Sun Aug 30 12:30:00 EDT 2020 / Sun Aug 30 09:30:00 PDT
> 2020)
> > > > > > > > > Voting can continue after this deadline until the release
> > > > > > > > > manager sends an email ending the vote.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > > > > > > > >     wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1
> > > > > 086/
> > > > > > > > >     # note the trailing slash is needed
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to