I agree with Dave that it could be moved out of Other and into the Project activity and Releases sections. But I don't know that it matters much.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:21 PM Daniel Roberts <ddani...@apache.org> wrote: > > Report looks good! > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:41 PM Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm fine with leaving it as-is, like I said, was just curious. > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:33 PM Ed Coleman <edcole...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I don't recall mentioning them at all. But the access library seems > > > significant because it is designed for re-use outside of Accumulo. The > > > others seem to be "here are some things you may find helpful" - maybe the > > > proxy is more than that? But I don't recall ever mention the proxy > > > specifically in a project report. > > > > > > Would if help if the sub-heading (it's at the same level as releases) > > read > > > "Other Releases:" ? > > > > > > On 2024/04/05 19:22:22 Dave Marion wrote: > > > > And I have no issue if that's what we do for other sub-projects (I was > > > > asking because I don't know / remember). > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:20 PM Ed Coleman <edcole...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Just curious why the Accumulo Access library mentions is in "Other". > > > > > > > > > > It was an arbitrary decision on my part. I wanted to make sure that > > it > > > > > was noted as an achievement / project activity. But, it did not seem > > > (to > > > > > me) to be an Accumulo release - reserving those for 2.x, 3,x .... > > > > > > > > > > I used other to actually highlight it - I could place it under > > project > > > > > activity if that is the consensus. Same as considering it as a > > > release - > > > > > but as you mentioned we don't seem to treat other sub-projects that > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2024/04/05 17:59:22 Dave Marion wrote: > > > > > > Just curious why the Accumulo Access library mentions is in > > "Other". > > > I > > > > > > think an alternate version of this could describe Accumulo Access > > in > > > the > > > > > > "Project Status" or "Project Activity" section and then add the > > > release > > > > > to > > > > > > the "Releases" section. Does it get relegated to "Other" because > > > it's a > > > > > > sub-project (is that what would happen to testing, docker, etc.)? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:34 AM Ed Coleman <edcole...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community > > > reports > > > > > on the > > > > > > > Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the April report for > > > review > > > > > / > > > > > > > comments. The report is due by Wednesday, April 10th. I'd like to > > > > > submit > > > > > > > the report on Friday, April 5th. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The text below is copied from the reporting tool and may not > > > reflect > > > > > the > > > > > > > final formatting of the final report when submitted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed Coleman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- begin report text from report tool --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ## Description: > > > > > > > The mission of Apache Accumulo is the creation and maintenance of > > > > > software > > > > > > > related to a robust, scalable, distributed key/value store with > > > > > cell-based > > > > > > > access control and customizable server-side processing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ## Project Status: > > > > > > > - Current project status: Ongoing with high activity. > > > > > > > - Issues for the board: None. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Accumulo is currently working on some significant development > > > efforts. > > > > > > > Improving > > > > > > > the performance and stability of the 2.1.x line, adding new > > > features > > > > > and > > > > > > > performance improvements to 3.1 line, and the evolution of the > > > > > processing > > > > > > > model to support dynamic scaling and provide elasticity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ## Membership Data: > > > > > > > Apache Accumulo was founded 2012-03-21 (12 years ago) There are > > > > > currently > > > > > > > 42 > > > > > > > committers and 39 PMC members in this project. The > > Committer-to-PMC > > > > > ratio > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > roughly 1:1. It is our practice to invite committers to be PMC > > > members > > > > > at > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > same time. The difference between committers and PMC members is > > > because > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > PMC members have elected to go emeritus. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Community changes, past quarter: > > > > > > > - No new PMC members. Last addition was Daniel Roberts on > > > 2023-08-09. > > > > > > > - No new committers. Last addition was Daniel Roberts on > > > 2023-08-10. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ## Project Activity: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ### Releases: > > > > > > > - accumulo-1.10.4 was released on 2023-11-16. > > > > > > > - accumulo-2.1.2 was released on 2023-08-21. > > > > > > > - accumulo-3.0.0 was released on 2023-08-21. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Accumulo 1-10.x line reached end-of-life and Accumulo-1.10.4 > > > is the > > > > > > > final release. The vote thread can be found at [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Activity on the next release of 2.1.3, has been very active with > > > > > bug-fixes > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > performance improvements that are being driven by community > > > adoption of > > > > > > > 2.1.x. Currently 174 PRs have been merged, and there are 21 open > > > issues > > > > > > > with 1 > > > > > > > labeled as a blocker for the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Work is actively proceeding on 3.1.0 that will contain new > > > features and > > > > > > > performance improvements. Currently, 3.1.0 has 266 merged PRs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In parallel to 3.1, work continues on the evolution of the > > Accumulo > > > > > > > processing > > > > > > > model to support dynamic scaling and provide elasticity [2]. The > > > goal > > > > > for > > > > > > > Accumulo is to move from a model where active table metadata and > > > table > > > > > data > > > > > > > management is hosted in active processes to a model that can > > > > > dynamically > > > > > > > scale > > > > > > > server components on-demand to provide configurable latency and > > > higher > > > > > > > scalability. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ### Other: > > > > > > > 2024-02-17 Released Accumulo Access Library. The library > > provides > > > a > > > > > > > stand-alone java library with an AccessExpression syntax and an > > > ANTLRv4 > > > > > > > grammar that enables reuse separate from Accumulo. Within > > > Accumulo, > > > > > the > > > > > > > AccessExpression is used in the ColumnVisibility and > > > > > VisibilityEvaluator to > > > > > > > provide column-level authorization for data access. The vote > > > thread is > > > > > > > available at [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ## Community Health: > > > > > > > Overall community health is good and GitHub activity remains > > > > > consistent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The email traffic reflects the community preference of using > > GitHub > > > > > > > projects > > > > > > > and issues for planning and PRs for code discussions. We also use > > > our > > > > > slack > > > > > > > channel for day-to-day communications. We continue to use the > > > mailing > > > > > list > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > official Apache business and remains a channel for users to > > > contact us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ## Links > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6jy0v0qk14163xx19ocz4l3xxc1rzr3z > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/164/views/1 > > > > > > > [3] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/q96v767png90mfm4t330kfbjvml0rc37 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- end text --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
