+1 from me as well. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat [email protected] Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Yes this is also what Chris Mattmann voted +1 as on this discussion > [1] would be a solution. > > > [1] > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Remove-the-old-ActiveMQ-Console-td4675925.html#a4676010 > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Gary Tully <[email protected]> wrote: > > Exactly, I don't see any good reason for treating it differently. > > I think skinning is enough. > > > > On 22 January 2014 22:44, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Starting up a new thread to avoid hijacking the original POLL thread. > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Without the hawt.io community donating the relevant ActiveMQ portions > to the > >>> ASF we will not be able to get a consensus around proposal #3. Thus, > that > >>> needs to be taken off the table. > >> > >> I think that's a faulty assumption that needs to get discussed and > addressed. > >> > >> Any hawtio UI that we package in the ActiveMQ will be reviewed by the > >> PMC. Like any 3rd party library that we ship, it has to have an > >> approved license and it's functionality has to be tested and verified > >> by the ActiveMQ project. If we the PMC does not like some detail of > >> hawtio we just need to open issues to address them and once it's to > >> the PMC's liking we can then package it. This is no different from > >> any other 3rd party lib we use so why are we treating it differently? > >> > >> -- > >> Hiram Chirino > > > > > > > > -- > > http://redhat.com > > http://blog.garytully.com > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > Email: [email protected] > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > Make your Camel applications look hawt, try: http://hawt.io >
