+1

Don't see reason why this is not enough to solve the current issues that have been raised.

On 01/27/2014 06:44 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
+1 from me as well.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi

Yes this is also what Chris Mattmann voted +1 as on this discussion
[1] would be a solution.


[1]
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Remove-the-old-ActiveMQ-Console-td4675925.html#a4676010


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Exactly, I don't see any good reason for treating it differently.
I think skinning is enough.

On 22 January 2014 22:44, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
Starting up a new thread to avoid hijacking the original POLL thread.

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Without the hawt.io community donating the relevant ActiveMQ portions
to the
ASF we will not be able to get a consensus around proposal #3. Thus,
that
needs to be taken off the table.
I think that's a faulty assumption that needs to get discussed and
addressed.
Any hawtio UI that we package in the ActiveMQ will be reviewed by the
PMC.  Like any 3rd party library that we ship, it has to have an
approved license and it's functionality has to be tested and verified
by the ActiveMQ project.  If we the PMC does not like some detail of
hawtio we just need to open issues to address them and once it's to
the PMC's liking we can then package it.  This is no different from
any other 3rd party lib we use so why are we treating it differently?

--
Hiram Chirino


--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com


--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Make your Camel applications look hawt, try: http://hawt.io



--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to