I don't think we will need virtual topics if we support JMS2
> On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:29, Daniel Guggi <[email protected]> wrote: > > correction "Message Destinations" -> "Message Groups" > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Daniel Guggi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> @Configuration format file >> I as a user wouldn't mind either >> >> Features I'd also like to have in v6 >> - Message Destinations (afaik already...) >> - Virtual Destination/Topics support >> - and big +1 for "Auto-creation of destinations" >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Clebert Suconic < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It wasn't clear to me if the format of the Configuration file is >>> really important or not. If I was the user i wouldn't mind. >>> >>> Users will have to change the configs anyways... things like the >>> journal will have new settings... paging address... address-settings.. >>> other things.. but if the XML taste is a big thing it could be >>> revisited. >>> >>> I just wanted to clear that before we jumped ahead into writing code for >>> it. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:56 AM, James Carman >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> In order for ActiveMQ {CodeName} to take over as the next generation >>>> of ActiveMQ, it obviously must have some level of feature parity with >>>> the existing ActiveMQ 5.x (or 6.x if it's released before that >>>> transition) offering. We should come up with some level of a roadmap >>>> together about which features are required. Thus far, the only >>>> big-ticket items that have been addressed are: >>>> >>>> 1. The OpenWire protocol is supported >>>> 2. Auto-creation of destinations (mostly complete). >>>> >>>> This is obviously not all of what the existing ActiveMQ is all about. >>>> What other features are folks wanting to see in the next generation >>>> ActiveMQ? >>>> >>>> James >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >> >>
