well.. we have Hierarchical queues. I"m not sure if it's the same thing.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > We already have Message Groups.. .maybe someone could review it to > check if it's compatible.. (It should be BTW.. we used to compete) > > > for OSGI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-93 > > Virtual Topics: again: we already have it... needs to check if it's > totally compatible (which should be) > > > > > AutoCreate: we already have it.. and I'm improving it this week.. so > it shouldn't be a problem. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Daniel Guggi <[email protected]> wrote: >> correction "Message Destinations" -> "Message Groups" >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Daniel Guggi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> @Configuration format file >>> I as a user wouldn't mind either >>> >>> Features I'd also like to have in v6 >>> - Message Destinations (afaik already...) >>> - Virtual Destination/Topics support >>> - and big +1 for "Auto-creation of destinations" >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Clebert Suconic < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It wasn't clear to me if the format of the Configuration file is >>>> really important or not. If I was the user i wouldn't mind. >>>> >>>> Users will have to change the configs anyways... things like the >>>> journal will have new settings... paging address... address-settings.. >>>> other things.. but if the XML taste is a big thing it could be >>>> revisited. >>>> >>>> I just wanted to clear that before we jumped ahead into writing code for >>>> it. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:56 AM, James Carman >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > In order for ActiveMQ {CodeName} to take over as the next generation >>>> > of ActiveMQ, it obviously must have some level of feature parity with >>>> > the existing ActiveMQ 5.x (or 6.x if it's released before that >>>> > transition) offering. We should come up with some level of a roadmap >>>> > together about which features are required. Thus far, the only >>>> > big-ticket items that have been addressed are: >>>> > >>>> > 1. The OpenWire protocol is supported >>>> > 2. Auto-creation of destinations (mostly complete). >>>> > >>>> > This is obviously not all of what the existing ActiveMQ is all about. >>>> > What other features are folks wanting to see in the next generation >>>> > ActiveMQ? >>>> > >>>> > James >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] >>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com -- Clebert Suconic http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected] http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
