I agree with Raul here. I know HornetQ is based on Netty but does that really imply it's based on a reactive programming model? If so, +1 ActiveMQ Reactive (non-binding), otherwise +1 ActiveMQ Artemis (non-binding).
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:10 PM, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, thanks for setting me straight. I am going to stick with Artemis > anyway > as that was the direction I was leaning originally. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Pick-a-code-name-for-the-HornetQ-code-donation-tp4694889p4695103.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
