On 07/07/2015 06:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Would this apply to all activemq repos, including Artemis and Apollo?
I'd request it for all of them unless someone has an objection to doing so.
> On Jul 7, 2015 1:34 PM, "Timothy Bish" <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey, awhile back Robbie brought this up on the dev list but it didn't
> get much attention so I thought I'd bring it up and see if anyone had
> any issues with us asking infra to enable the svngit2jira bit on our
> various repos? If not I'm happy to open the request with infra and
> provide them the info on our various source repositories to link to
> their respective Jira spaces.
>
> Having worked over in QPid land for awhile where they have this turned
> on I've found it much more useful than Fisheye. Below I've quoted in
> Robbie's original message.
>
> {quote}
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering what people thought about asking for the svngit2jira
> integration[1] being turned on for the ActiveMQ repo/JIRA? I find it
> very useful to know what work if any has been done against a JIRA so
> far, and it can make tracking things down later much nicer.
>
> For those that don't know of it, it essentially comments on a JIRA each
> time a commit is made with a JIRA key (and I think also supports
> mentioning peoples names to notify them), e.g. look at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6334 for examples.
>
> I know that Fisheye is set up for the JIRA project but I find that
> less useful generally, and the information may also get lost in future
> if that goes away (such as all the historic svn commit info was lost
> when the related JIRA plugin was removed)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Robbie
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/svngit2jira.html
>
> {quote}
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
> tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
--
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.b...@redhat.com | www.redhat.com
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
