+1 Regards -- Dejan Bosanac http://sensatic.net/about
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Bennet Schulz <m...@bennet-schulz.de> wrote: > +1 > > > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:16 schrieb Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com>: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.com> > wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Christopher Shannon" <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> > >> To: dev@activemq.apache.org > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:45:41 AM > >> Subject: [DISCUSS] LevelDB deprecation > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> I just wanted to ask what people think about officially deprecating > LevelDB > >> in our 5.x broker and update our documentation to say that it is no > longer > >> recommended. We can leave it in the code base for people who are still > >> using it but discourage its use. > >> > >> The main reason is that KahaDB continues to be the main focus where bugs > >> are fixed and not much attention is paid to LevelDB. There seems to be > >> several issues with corruption (especially with replication) so I don't > >> think it should be a recommended store unless the stability is sorted > out. > >> Unfortunately nearly every Jira reported against LevelDB goes ignored. > >> > >> Now that Artemis exists and supports replication I think the focus > should > >> be primarily on making Artemis the focus for users who need a replicated > >> store or to encourage the use of something like a shared file system > >> master/slave setup. > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > >
