No objections. I was never clear on what advantages LevelDB was supposed to offer anyway.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016, 3:45 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems like a good idea to me. > > On 15 November 2016 at 11:45, Christopher Shannon > <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I just wanted to ask what people think about officially deprecating > LevelDB > > in our 5.x broker and update our documentation to say that it is no > longer > > recommended. We can leave it in the code base for people who are still > > using it but discourage its use. > > > > The main reason is that KahaDB continues to be the main focus where bugs > > are fixed and not much attention is paid to LevelDB. There seems to be > > several issues with corruption (especially with replication) so I don't > > think it should be a recommended store unless the stability is sorted > out. > > Unfortunately nearly every Jira reported against LevelDB goes ignored. > > > > Now that Artemis exists and supports replication I think the focus should > > be primarily on making Artemis the focus for users who need a replicated > > store or to encourage the use of something like a shared file system > > master/slave setup. >
