Greetings Justin. Do you have any time to chat about the artemis implementation of ActiveMQConnectionFactory, and why the setters and getters were removed?
We are working on integration of AMQ with bigdata tools and they are expecting AMQ-Artemis to behave as old AMQConnectionFactory used to. By this I am referencing the omission of an exposed interface for setting and getting brokerURL. Any insight on this topic would be appreciated, since I looked at a patch and it required either a legacy named wrapper of ActiveMQConnectionFactory, or ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory, to re-insert the setBrokerURL and getBrokerURL. I figured this would get a huge "heck-no" from the team if I attempted to create an issue, and submit a pull request, so I wanted to verify the situation before moving forward. (This is due to NiagraFiles requiring access to the brokerURL property, because of the assumed accessor methods which existed in AMQ prior to artemis.) Is there an internal AMQ dev list that I can get on, at RH? I apologize if this inquiry is out-of-scope for this list. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm planning an Artemis release (2.4.0) later this week so anybody who > wants a fix should send a PR if they haven't already. > > > Justin > -- Martes G Wigglesworth Senior Middleware Consultant Red Hat Consulting Red Hat, Inc. Office Phone: 804 343 6084 <callto:804%20343%206084> - 8136084 Office Email: [email protected]
