I'm still dealing with some auto-create defaults.. I could figure out everything I need but I'm still cleaning up my code before I can put a PR. and one last case I need to investigate. Can we delay till monday (or.. I hope not Tuesday.. but possibly)
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > I am having an issue with auto created destinations. I am trying to get it > done by tomorrow. If not will ask a delay. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:58 AM Michael André Pearce > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Justin, >> >> I’ve just put an issue in hawtio asking if they can tag in the next day or >> two, as I’d like to bump hawtio version before we tag if possible. >> >> essentially there are some bug fixes (escaped mbean url) that are fixed >> already in their master but they simply haven’t tagged. I would hope we know >> in next day if they’re able to do this. >> >> But if we could hold off just for a day or so please, so we have the >> chance. >> >> Cheers >> Mike >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 23 Oct 2017, at 16:30, Martes Wigglesworth <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Definitely. >> > >> > I am re-posting now. >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Andy Taylor <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> This probably warrants a separate thread >> >> >> >> On 23 October 2017 at 16:11, Martes Wigglesworth <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Greetings Justin. >> >>> >> >>> Do you have any time to chat about the artemis implementation of >> >>> ActiveMQConnectionFactory, and why the setters and getters were >> >>> removed? >> >>> >> >>> We are working on integration of AMQ with bigdata tools and they are >> >>> expecting AMQ-Artemis to behave as old AMQConnectionFactory used to. >> >>> >> >>> By this I am referencing the omission of an exposed interface for >> >>> setting >> >>> and getting brokerURL. >> >>> >> >>> Any insight on this topic would be appreciated, since I looked at a >> >>> patch >> >>> and it required either a legacy named wrapper of >> >> ActiveMQConnectionFactory, >> >>> or ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory, to re-insert the setBrokerURL and >> >>> getBrokerURL. >> >>> >> >>> I figured this would get a huge "heck-no" from the team if I attempted >> >>> to >> >>> create an issue, and submit a pull request, so I wanted to verify the >> >>> situation before moving forward. (This is due to NiagraFiles >> >>> requiring >> >>> access to the brokerURL property, because of the assumed accessor >> >>> methods >> >>> which existed in AMQ prior to artemis.) >> >>> >> >>> Is there an internal AMQ dev list that I can get on, at RH? >> >>> >> >>> I apologize if this inquiry is out-of-scope for this list. >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I'm planning an Artemis release (2.4.0) later this week so anybody >> >>>> who >> >>>> wants a fix should send a PR if they haven't already. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Justin >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Martes G Wigglesworth >> >>> Senior Middleware Consultant >> >>> Red Hat Consulting >> >>> Red Hat, Inc. >> >>> Office Phone: 804 343 6084 <callto:804%20343%206084> - 8136084 >> >>> Office Email: [email protected] >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Martes G Wigglesworth >> > Senior Middleware Consultant >> > Red Hat Consulting >> > Red Hat, Inc. >> > Office Phone: 804 343 6084 <callto:804%20343%206084> - 8136084 >> > Office Email: [email protected] > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
