They are different though… A PR discussion is exactly that… a discussion. If there are things in the PR discussions like code suggestions and back and forth about opinions on how something is done and such, they SHOULD be on the dev list as they are dev discussions. The commit is more “final”.
That is also the reason that the “reply-to” field on the commit list is the dev list. If you reply to a commit, it’s starting a discussion which goes to the dev list. Thus, if we wanted to completely mimic the commits, it would be that the “Open PR” and “Close PR" emails would go to a different list, but any discussion/replys would go to the dev list. I’m not sure that buys much. Dan > On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:44 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > You could use the same argument to have committs being fed here... > it's too noisy! > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: >> -1 >> >> Unless PR discussions can exist on the dev list I'm against moving that to >> another list as that is part of the development process. >> >> >> On 12/06/2017 05:34 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>> >>> in my view... and in my plan... going forward now I plan to make more >>> discussions on the dev list.. especially around this Roadmap idea. >>> >>> >>> What if: >>> >>> - We move github traffic to another list.. (commit perhaps)? >>> - We can still use github to talk about spot on issues.. such as.. the >>> format here sucks... the logic here is not accurate.. etc.. etc... >>> which this is the kind of noise that's feeding this list like crazy. >>> ..... You could use the same argument to bring JIRA comments to the >>> dev list.. it would be too noise.. I believe that's been the case at >>> some point >>> >>> But if there is a meaningful discussion... then we would refer the >>> dev-list... just like as we do in other places. (JIRA, private list.. >>> etc.. etc) >>> >>> >>> That seems a reasonable thing to me. It would help us to be more >>> active on the dev list.. which is what we need now. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:20 PM, jgenender <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Daniel Kulp wrote >>>>> >>>>> I’m -0.5 on moving them. PR’s (and the conversations in them) are part >>>>> of >>>>> the development process and should be on the dev list. >>>> >>>> But the deluge often loses the discussion which is why some projects have >>>> commit lists. This is the difference between projects that work off PRs >>>> and >>>> projects whose committers mainly just commit directly to the repository. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately as pointed out earlier, the volume of noise created causes >>>> a >>>> certain amount of people to lose conversations. Some use Nabble, some >>>> use >>>> an email client. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from: >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Tim Bish >> twitter: @tabish121 >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
