There is more to dev discussions than just code. Example. Roadmap. Architectural decisions. High level stuff that could catch some folks who’s opinion are valuable but don’t like spending time on messages like. Hey there is an extra space here. Things we talk on GitHub PR.
This change can’t bother devs. It doesn’t bother me. But I see the value of it for people with that high level mentality. On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:44 AM Jiri Danek <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that the message volume of non-PR messages on the dev@ list is not > that high, wouldn't it make some sense to > discuss anything which is not low-level code-oriented stuff on the users@ > list, and keep using dev@ for archiving the low-level code-focused PR > discussions? > -- > Jiri Daněk > -- Clebert Suconic
