+1
That native stuff deserves a separate place from Artemis.

Howard

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 8:08 AM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
wrote:

> gitbox is down (confrmed it on twitter @
> https://status.apache.org/incidents/4mqjzt9ysd8w?u=w1f97xydgrxq (down
> at the time I wrote the email).
>
>
> So, I will redo it on monday.
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:30 PM Clebert Suconic
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes. I got that.
> >
> >
> > I am giving the -1 on this case.  The native stays untouched for a long
> time. I wanted those fixes in.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:24 PM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, hopefully I was clear that I did not vote and didnt think it
> >> needed a respin, but OK :)
> >>
> >> Robbie
> >>
> >> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 22:08, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > @Robbie: I will take your findings as -1: Let me explain!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm thinking a next release will only happen rarely.. long time from
> now...
> >> >
> >> > So, I will rather fix it now.. it's easy to re-spin now.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:34 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Looks good.
> >> > >
> >> > > They indeed dont affect the binary, and they arent blockers, but do
> >> > > note the actual release is the source archive.
> >> > >
> >> > > Robbie
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 20:15, Clebert Suconic <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks Robbie: They do not affect the binary at all, and are minor
> >> > > > issues on the source. So, I am fixing these on this PR:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-native/pull/2
> >> > > >
> >> > > > (please if you could review it.. if I missed anything you will
> >> > > > probably be able to spot it on the PR.)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:29 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native
> 1.0.0 release.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Source distribution can be found here:
> >> > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis-native/1.0.0/
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Maven repository is here:
> >> > > > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1178
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > The source tag:
> >> > > > > >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis-native.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0.0
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Notice this is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis, and the
> release
> >> > > > > > notes will be part of the main component. And also, the
> binary here is
> >> > > > > > distributed through maven.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
> >> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Here's my +1
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Clebert Suconic
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Not a vote as I cant try it out at the moment, though its not
> binding
> >> > > > > anyway. Just some comments from giving it a quick skim around
> trivial
> >> > > > > issues that should be fixed for the release if someone finds a
> >> > > > > blocking issue:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - LICENSE contains some incorrect detail, though for a file that
> >> > > > > doesnt actually exist in the release.
> >> > > > > - NOTICE should have the contained name updated to more fully
> match the release.
> >> > > > > - The README ordering is a bit off. It initially lists a bunch
> of
> >> > > > > dependencies for you to install, then tells you how to build
> with
> >> > > > > Docker that presumably means you dont need them installed (but
> do need
> >> > > > > Docker, which isnt listed), and then after that goes back to
> giving
> >> > > > > manual build instructions where you would need them installed.
> >> > > > > - The example in the README sets JAVA_HOME to a Java7 install
> but 8 is required.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Robbie
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Clebert Suconic
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Reply via email to