Jeff, I apologize for the confusion. I understand that not everybody
follows every thread, and I'm not under the impression that they must. I
tried to lay out my "problem" (although I'd categorize it as more of a
concern) in my initial email on this thread and have tried to clarify along
the way. It's essentially this - there is an apparent lack of developer
commitment to NMS & CMS evidenced by stale website content, abandoned code
(e.g. many of the provider implementations), and lack of developer
diversity (i.e. only a few developers contributing over the last several
years).

My goal has *never* been to "kill" either project, remove documentation, or
delete code repositories. My goal, as stated in my original email on this
thread, is to make sure the website is "up-to-date and clear so that users
can make informed decisions on what software to use." In a more recent
email I said, "One of the goals of the website overhaul is to make things
more clear for users so I thought it might make sense to update the NMS &
CMS pages to reflect the apparent lack of commitment from the community."
Again, removing code was never on the table. I apologize if this hasn't
been clear.

ActiveMQ has been a leader in the messaging space for awhile now. It
behooves us to have up-to-date and clear information on our website for the
benefit of our users and developers. All I'm after is clarification.


Justin



On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:20 AM jgenender <[email protected]> wrote:

> Justin, what seems to be the problem?  Not everyone follows every thread,
> so
> they don't always speak up.  They don't have to.  The JIRA and comments in
> past threads speak for themselves.  I am simply pointing that out.
>
> It seems like you are trying to kill this.  You have had a couple of people
> say there is value.  If you want to cut the web part of it because its a
> PITA, thats fine by me.  But the APIs as projects should stay.  If you want
> to link back to old doc, so be it.
>
> -1 from me to removing those code bases.  I am open to leaving them as a
> sub-project for code only with a nice readme.md.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>

Reply via email to