I haven’t checked all the files, i don’t have time. But simply the parent wildfly project is LPGL and I’ve found one file with LGPL, this is a concern, and going forwards this is risky as they may move more files from Wildfly project into it.
> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:10, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> > wrote: > > There is a class in there which was taken from wildfly but keeps its gnu > license (as it has to) > https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/blob/d8397e1174a193aaab5db510da514f6039be6742/src/test/java/org/wildfly/common/string/CompositeCharSequenceTestCase.java > > As such even so they declare it Apache, it isn’t because inside is code that > is LPGL from wildly. > >> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This was the dependency added: >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.wildfly.common</groupId> >> <artifactId>wildfly-common</artifactId> >> </dependency> >> >> Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See >> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/blob/master/LICENSE. >> >> I could see your point if a dependency on org.wildfly:wildfly-parent was >> added as that is LGPL as you noted. >> >> At this point I don't see a problem. >> >> >> Justin >> >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:02 PM Michael André Pearce >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Wildfly project: >>> >>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/LICENSE.txt >>> >>> >>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:01, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you sure about that? Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See >>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common. >>>> >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michael André Pearce >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>>> >>>>> It’s a category x, in my understanding. >>>>> >>>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 20:46, Michael André Pearce < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2661 >>>>> introduced an LPGL dependency into ActiveMQ Artemis. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can we please revert this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >
