WildFly is not the parent project of wildfly-commons, it is just hosted on the same repository.
The jbpss-parent pom and wildfly-commons are under ASL 2.0 There are 2 files with wrong headers for which I'm going to submit a PR and ask for a release. Cheers, Emmanuel On 06/06/2019 22:11, Michael André Pearce wrote: > I haven’t checked all the files, i don’t have time. But simply the parent > wildfly project is LPGL and I’ve found one file with LGPL, this is a concern, > and going forwards this is risky as they may move more files from Wildfly > project into it. > >> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:10, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> There is a class in there which was taken from wildfly but keeps its gnu >> license (as it has to) >> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/blob/d8397e1174a193aaab5db510da514f6039be6742/src/test/java/org/wildfly/common/string/CompositeCharSequenceTestCase.java >> >> As such even so they declare it Apache, it isn’t because inside is code that >> is LPGL from wildly. >> >>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> This was the dependency added: >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.wildfly.common</groupId> >>> <artifactId>wildfly-common</artifactId> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See >>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/blob/master/LICENSE. >>> >>> I could see your point if a dependency on org.wildfly:wildfly-parent was >>> added as that is LGPL as you noted. >>> >>> At this point I don't see a problem. >>> >>> >>> Justin >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:02 PM Michael André Pearce >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Wildfly project: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/LICENSE.txt >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:01, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure about that? Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See >>>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Justin >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michael André Pearce >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >>>>>> >>>>>> It’s a category x, in my understanding. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 Jun 2019, at 20:46, Michael André Pearce < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2661 >>>>>> introduced an LPGL dependency into ActiveMQ Artemis. >>>>>>> Can we please revert this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
