In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you actually did cast the first vote in the thread.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree with Robbie. > > I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would > like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a > vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member). > > However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close > the vote. > > Regards > JB > > On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding > > +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to > > have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it > > is the PMC that must agree to the release happening. > > > > I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm > > not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC > > obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos > > votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd > > expect its the former though. > > > > This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details > > the 3 binding +1 votes requirement: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > > > I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from > > Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise), > > which if cast would get the required 3. > > > > Robbie > > > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates > >> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says: > >> > >> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more > >> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed. > >> Votes cast by PMC members are binding. > >> > >> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've > >> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes > >> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this > >> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback. > >> > >> It also says: > >> > >> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all > >> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet > >> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all > >> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their > >> own platform. > >> > >> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted. > >> > >> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread. > >> > >> > >> Justin > >> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi PMC > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Best > >>> > >>> > >>> Mike > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Get Outlook for Android > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4v...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box > >>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully). > >>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 (Binding) > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi All, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now > >>>> resolved. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please > >>>>> check it and vote accordingly. > >>>>> > >>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP > >>> client.. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to > >>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly, > >>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget. > >>>>> > >>>>> The files can be grabbed > >>>>> from: > >>>> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/ > >>>>> > >>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Michael > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Clebert Suconic > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
