Sorry, I meant for Artemis Native vote, sorry for the cross meaning. Regards JB
On 06/11/2019 18:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you > actually did cast the first vote in the thread. > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree with Robbie. >> >> I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would >> like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a >> vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member). >> >> However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close >> the vote. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding >>> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to >>> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it >>> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening. >>> >>> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm >>> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC >>> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos >>> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd >>> expect its the former though. >>> >>> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details >>> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement: >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >>> >>> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from >>> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise), >>> which if cast would get the required 3. >>> >>> Robbie >>> >>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates >>>> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says: >>>> >>>> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more >>>> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed. >>>> Votes cast by PMC members are binding. >>>> >>>> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've >>>> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes >>>> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this >>>> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback. >>>> >>>> It also says: >>>> >>>> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all >>>> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet >>>> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all >>>> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their >>>> own platform. >>>> >>>> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted. >>>> >>>> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread. >>>> >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi PMC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Get Outlook for Android >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +0000, "Krzysztof" <h4v...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box >>>>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully). >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (Binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now >>>>>> resolved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please >>>>>>> check it and vote accordingly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP >>>>> client.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to >>>>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly, >>>>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The files can be grabbed >>>>>>> from: >>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
