Yes, so JDK 9+ on 5.16.0 and JMS 2.0 after 5.16.0. Fair enough, I'm moving forward like this.
Thanks for your feedback guys. Regards JB On 06/01/2020 13:36, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I agree with Robbie, it's a -1 from me to try and include JMS 2.0 at this > point in 5.16.0 as it's way too late to try and add such a big change. It > needs to be 5.17.0 or higher. > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Even if it were almost complete, which it doesnt sound like it is, >> such a significant change would still seem better positioned for a >> 5.17.0 at this point than dropped into an almost-ready 5.16.0 at the >> last moment. >> >> Either way I would suggest updating the draft report to be clearer as >> it doesnt currently read in line with the below, saying "5.16.0 will >> be an important milestone with full JDK 9+ support and JMS 2.0 support >> as well." >> >> The example skeleton on reporter.apache.org doesnt include the stats >> from what I recall as they often asked folks not to include them, so >> I'd drop those. I just give a summary line in reports. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 12:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Robbie, >>> >>> yeah, 5.16.0 is still my top priority and it's almost ready. JDK 9+ is >>> OK (including on Karaf). JMS 2.0 is "optional" for 5.16.0 (but I think >>> it's worth to try to have it). So, it's more an indication in terms of >>> "best effort", not a strong commitment. >>> In term of timeline, 5.16.0 could be submitted to vote end of next week. >>> >>> For the report, we should use the reporter.apache.org that create the >>> report skeleton for us. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 06/01/2020 11:53, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>>> You mentioned on the 5.15.11 vote thread that a 5.16.0 vote would >>>> happen in late November, but it was suggested to skip that particular >>>> week and so folks had returned from holidays around US Thanksgiving. >>>> Its been a bit longer now, but is the intent still to release 5.16.0 >>>> very soon? I ask as the text added in the report draft indicates >>>> 5.16.0 will include JMS 2 support, but there doesnt seem to have been >>>> work committed on that as yet. If thats the case it would seem >>>> surprising to include in 5.16.0 at this point, several weeks after >>>> indication it was primed for release, instead of say doing 5.16.0 and >>>> only then adding potentially large changes afterwards towards a 5.17.0 >>>> following the needed time to bake them. >>>> >>>> The mailing list stats should probably be removed from the report, and >>>> just a summary line given. The board have in the past typically asked >>>> for the stats not to be c&p from the reporter tool unless they show >>>> important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a >>>> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the >>>> prior one without thier effect. >>>> >>>> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release >> date. >>>> >>>> Robbie >>>> >>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bruce, >>>>> >>>>> Happy new year to you as well ! >>>>> >>>>> I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall >> activity). >>>>> Please let me know if it's OK for you. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote: >>>>>> Happy New Year everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions >> to the >>>>>> latest report to the ASF board: >>>>>> >>>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 >>>>>> >>>>>> This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
