I'm a bit overloaded today. I will take a look Tuesday (since Monday is a 
public holiday).

Cheers,

Emmanuel

Le 29/05/2020 à 17:55, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
> @Emmanuel: I rebased your branch here:
> https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-artemis/tree/java_11
>
> Perhaps you may want to take a look.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:54 AM Clebert Suconic
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> so, if we switched to JDK 11 on the CI, those would still work with
>> the trick you used?
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> I changed the way the classloaders where working with JDK 11 using the 
>>> plateform classloader as the parent instead of null so that I could
>>> access the required modules.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>> Le 29/05/2020 à 17:37, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
>>>> We should come back into this...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How did you fix the compatibility tests with JDK 11? do you need JDK 8
>>>> to run the compatibility tests?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:19 PM Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> No relation to WildFly, just for the 'fun' of it and because switching my 
>>>>> JAVA_HOME and PATH each time I wxanted to build was itching me too
>>>>> much ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> It can wait and get some baking :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 08/05/2020 à 19:47, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
>>>>>> Oh wow.. that's awesome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we do the migration after the 2.13.0 release? I have pretty much
>>>>>> everything ready to go (besides a few changes we have to make next
>>>>>> week). doing this migration now would probably delay the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or you have some requirement for Wildfly that you must do this now? if
>>>>>> you do we can eventually delay it.. but I would prefer doing it for
>>>>>> later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:24 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When i need to work on Apache ActiveMQ Artemis I need to switch my 
>>>>>>> local environement to use OpenJDK 8 instead of the default OpenJDK 11
>>>>>>> which I use to develop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have started a branch 
>>>>>>> https://github.com/ehsavoie/activemq-artemis/tree/java_11 which builds 
>>>>>>> on OpenJDK 8 and 11 with the fast-tests profile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mvn clean install -Pfast-tests is passing for me locally :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't think that the CI or the release should use Java 11 but I hope 
>>>>>>> this will smoothen the time when the migration occurs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also I couldn't use the --release 8 flag for OpenJDK 11 because of the 
>>>>>>> use of Unsafe, if someone has a better alternative I'm all hears.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you want me to sumbit a PR for this ? Does this make sense to the 
>>>>>>> community ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to