that's cool.... we should move forward then!
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:19 PM Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> wrote: > > error-prone 2.4.0 has been released with JDK 14 and 15 support. > > This might answer your question :) > > Emmanuel > > Le 02/06/2020 à 18:31, Clebert Suconic a écrit : > > But I think it should be on anything 11+ > > > > I would rather avoid having to re-address this again in the future, > > and be generic enough. > > > > > > What's holding the build on JDK 13? is it error prone for sure or > > something else? > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:56 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I' ve updated my branch and rebased on current master from clebert's > >> branch. > >> > >> It passes a simple build on java 11.0.6 > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Emmanuel > >> > >> Le 08/05/2020 à 19:47, Clebert Suconic a écrit : > >>> Oh wow.. that's awesome. > >>> > >>> > >>> Can we do the migration after the 2.13.0 release? I have pretty much > >>> everything ready to go (besides a few changes we have to make next > >>> week). doing this migration now would probably delay the release. > >>> > >>> > >>> Or you have some requirement for Wildfly that you must do this now? if > >>> you do we can eventually delay it.. but I would prefer doing it for > >>> later. > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:24 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> When i need to work on Apache ActiveMQ Artemis I need to switch my local > >>>> environement to use OpenJDK 8 instead of the default OpenJDK 11 > >>>> which I use to develop. > >>>> > >>>> I have started a branch > >>>> https://github.com/ehsavoie/activemq-artemis/tree/java_11 which builds > >>>> on OpenJDK 8 and 11 with the fast-tests profile. > >>>> > >>>> mvn clean install -Pfast-tests is passing for me locally :) > >>>> > >>>> I don't think that the CI or the release should use Java 11 but I hope > >>>> this will smoothen the time when the migration occurs. > >>>> > >>>> Also I couldn't use the --release 8 flag for OpenJDK 11 because of the > >>>> use of Unsafe, if someone has a better alternative I'm all hears. > >>>> > >>>> Do you want me to sumbit a PR for this ? Does this make sense to the > >>>> community ? > >>>> > >>>> Emmanuel > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > -- Clebert Suconic
