OK, setting up a classic broker is not a problem but the SQL backend would be. I'll have to leave the test suite for others to run, and will just test for regressions in our NMS-based apps. Thanks for the clarification.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:59 AM Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a .net update release mainly. > > Historically all tests are for running against classic broker with sql > backend. This is as per previous releases. > > Obviously always welcome in future contributions to add test suites > focussed on artemis but thats out of scope for this .net update release. > > Best > Mike > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 25 Aug 2020, at 18:52, W B D <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've already built it, no problem there, but some tests are failing > > (Windows 10, Visual Studio 2019 16.7.1): > > > > - First two failed tests are AMQRedeliveryPolicyTest and > > BrokerToNMSExceptionsTest, maybe because my local test broker is Artemis > > rather than Classic? That doesn't mean it's incompatible with Artemis, > but > > that some tests may be assuming Classic behaviour. > > - Several other failed tests reference a missing config > > file C:\WINDOWS\System32\test\TestDbConfig.xml in the error message - > not > > sure what that's about. > > > > > >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:00 PM Havret <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, I don't think so. For what it's worth you could just take the > binaries > >> I created for rc1 attempt, and start testing against that. > >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:16 AM W B D <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> If I am targeting Windows, are there any changes expected that would > >> affect > >>> me, or are they just Linux related packaging / file permissions + some > >>> issues in the text of the LICENSE and NOTICE files? If that's all it > is, > >>> I'm thinking perhaps I will get the jump on this by building from > source > >>> and testing already. > >>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 2:20 PM Havret <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> It will, but I will need to find some time to go through Robbie's > >>> remarks. > >>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:29 PM W B D <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> Will there be an RC2 or a release forthcoming? I ported to .NET Core > >>> last > >>>>> spring, currently using William D Cossey's fork, which is a straight > >>> port > >>>>> of 1.7.x to NetStd. Looking forward to switch back to the newly > >>>> refactored > >>>>> official version once it's stabilized and ready to test. > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 8:26 AM Havret <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> Thanks, Robbie. I'm canceling the vote then. > >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:26 PM Robbie Gemmell < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>> The zip has similar permission issues seen on prior NMS related > >>>>>>> candidates when extracting on Linux, meaning you can extract the > >>> zip > >>>>>>> but then can't simply delete the resulting content (which would > >>> again > >>>>>>> be easier if contained in a subdir). > >>>>>>> The LICENCE file looks to include various cruft it shouldn't (in > >>>>>>> particular various Java stuff sticks out, plus there are multiple > >>>>>>> needless copies of the ALv2...seems like a lot of this isnt NMS > >>>>>>> relevant). > >>>>>>> The NOTICE file needs its years updated, component name fixed, > >> the > >>>>>>> silly header removed, and perhaps the content looked at for > >>> accuracy > >>>>>>> (is that referenced component actually included, not clear it > >> is?) > >>>>>>> I also dont see a tag relating to the vote. There were some > >>>>>>> release-related source changes made in the source repo after the > >>>>>>> archives were added to dist dev area, though I think those were > >> in > >>>> the > >>>>>>> archive? They'd need to be if required to recreate the release > >>> bits. > >>>> A > >>>>>>> tag should exist for whats in it either way. > >>>>>>> Robbie > >>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 18:36, Havret <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>>> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please > >>>>>>>> check it and vote accordingly. > >>>>>>>> This release brings .NET Standard 2.0 support. > >>>>>>>> The files can be grabbed from: > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-openwire/1.8.0-rc1/ > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>> Krzysztof > >
