Hi Chris,

I take the fault, no worries. I did the release, but I was swamped with bunch 
of things and not completed cleanly.

I will fix that.

I think I know well enough the Apache release process on different Apache 
projects (I can’t count the number of releases I did and still doing) to know 
that I did bad on the last ActiveMQ one.
I would like to remind that it’s the first time I messed with the announcement, 
and I will fix that.

So, sorry about that and, again I will fix that.
If you wanna help, you are welcome.

On Apache projects, when I see people having issue (time, personal, …), I 
propose my help. That’s the way it works IMHO.

Regards
JB

> Le 5 févr. 2021 à 17:12, Christopher Shannon 
> <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> With the discussion of trying to do quarterly releases and keep to a
> schedule I am going to chime in here and bring up the fact that I think
> that going forward as a project we need to do a much better job at
> completing the release process. Recently it seems that most releases are
> vastly delayed in having emails sent and the website updated, etc. I've
> done a ton of releases for 5.x and I know it's a bit of extra work to do
> things like update the site, CVE announcements, release announcements, etc
> but it's all part of doing a release. The process doesn't end when the vote
> ends and the artifacts are uploaded.
> 
> Obviously doing a release is voluntary and no one is obligated to do one
> (but it is appreciated of course). However, that being said, my opinion is
> if someone chooses to take on the task of doing a release and be the
> release manager for it they need to complete the entire process in a timely
> manner and not let it drag on for days and weeks.
> 
> Chris
> 
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Let me check (I did it but maybe forgot to send ;)).
>> 
>> I will fix that if it didn’t go.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 5 févr. 2021 à 16:46, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Did I miss the announcement going out?  Seems like it should have been
>> done
>>> by now but I don't see it, although website appears to but updated now.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Robbie,
>>>> 
>>>> I was about to update website. Thanks for catching this !
>>>> 
>>>> I will move forward on announcement.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> 
>>>>> Le 29 janv. 2021 à 14:38, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have just updated the website to change the download page to 5.16.1,
>>>>> add the 5.16.1 release page (which notes the announced CVE Gary
>>>>> already updated the site with), and fix the broken links for the
>>>>> 5.16.0 page. The site should be updated before the prior release is
>>>>> removed from mirrors, or it breaks the links.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I leave any further tweaks and announcements needed to you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 05:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry, I’m late about website update, announcement and CVE publication
>>>> for ActiveMQ 5.16.1.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I will fix that asap (at least during the week end).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry about that,
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Tim Bish
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to