I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic
<[email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021 14:33 (GMT+00:00) To:
[email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main We will
have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make theswitch on
GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
<[email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why
better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin
Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub repos
just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's infrastructure? I know
when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If the GitHub repo
is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the branch on Apache first? I'm
not real clear on all the> > details of how the integration works so maybe
that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt
Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >> GitHub solved the PR move if the
rename is done via their UI:> >>> >> https://github.com/github/renaming
<https://github.com/github/renaming>> >>> >> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at
2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>
Good point.> >>>> >>> I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In
artemis you could use the scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5,
2021 at 2:54 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no
problem. Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!>
>>>>> >>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >>
[email protected]>> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose
to rename all of our git branches as main on> >>>>> all of our branches. This
would be a very first easy step to take on> >>>>> renaming offensive language
from our codebases.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow some time before we do that,
say 7 days after we> decide> >>>>> to take the move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees
a problem with that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if anyone has internal forks depending on
master (say if you have a> >>>>> downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will
likely have to update your> >>>>> internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>>
We could keep the master for some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>>
remove it later.> >>>>> >>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic
