The website actually uses Jekyll. The branch it uses is controlled via the .asf.yaml file [1]. More details about this are here [2].
Justin [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/master/.asf.yaml [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-JekyllCMS On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:42 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > I see the website is the pelican system. > > I'm not sure how the AMQ5 is configured on Jenkins... that's the only thing > I'm lost now. > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:31 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > That's right.. I will do it for all the Branches... > > > > > > At this point now I'm looking to what I would need to change on ci-builds > > > > > > I'm looking on ci-builds for things we would need to change.. > > > > however I don't understand how ActiveMQ5 is configured here: > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/ > > > > > > I could find the simple configuration on artemis, but AMQ5 is using > > some fancy configuration that I don't know where it's taking it from. > > > > @Jb or anyone can you give me some pointers here? I'm really curious > > now.. (I know you could say you would change it. .but at this point > > I'm trying to understand what is going on :) ) > > > > > > Also: where is the build for the website? I can't find it on > > ci-builds.apache.org > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > That’s my guess as well ;) > > > > > > > Le 9 mars 2021 à 08:57, michael.andre.pearce < > > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > > > I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent from > my > > Galaxy > > > > -------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic < > > [email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021 14:33 (GMT+00:00) To: > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main > We > > will have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make > theswitch > > on GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > > [email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why > > better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin > > Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub > > repos just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's > infrastructure? > > I know when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If > the > > GitHub repo is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the branch on > > Apache first? I'm not real clear on all the> > details of how the > > integration works so maybe that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, > Mar > > 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >> > > GitHub solved the PR move if the rename is done via their UI:> >>> >> > > https://github.com/github/renaming <https://github.com/github/renaming>> > > >>> >> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic < > > [email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>> Good point.> >>>> >>> > > I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In artemis you could > use > > the scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM > > Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no problem. > > Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!> >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >> > > [email protected]>> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to > > propose to rename all of our git branches as main on> >>>>> all of our > > branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on> >>>>> renaming > > offensive language from our codebases.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow some > > time before we do that, say 7 days after we> decide> >>>>> to take the > > move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if > > anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a> >>>>> > > downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your> > >>>>> > > internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could keep the master > for > > some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>> remove it later.> >>>>> > > >>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > >
