Yes, we are "aligned" ;) My proposal is to cut 5.15.15 announcing it’s the "last" release on the series.
Regards JB > Le 15 mars 2021 à 17:09, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Not sure if we maybe crossed meanings there. To be clearer/sure: I was > saying that retiring 5.15.x now with 5.15.15 sounds like a plan, i.e. > have the release page and announcements for 5.15.15 say its the last > intended 5.15.x and upgrade to 5.16.x. (Given that, it might make > sense to do both releases at the same time) > > The January mention was just about the prior discussion where noone > argued against the idea: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra77d11eb426f4eb3ecadbbd9d3444df23088663188567239e398916c%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 14:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Robbie, >> >> Thanks for your feedback. >> >> 1. Absolutely about the published artifacts, I will take care of this. >> >> 2. January sounds good to me. >> >> Thanks again >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 15 mars 2021 à 14:37, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 16:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> We already did (or plan to do soon) some updates addressing CVE fixes, and >>>> fixing bug. >>>> >>>> I’m starting Jira triage now and working on some fixes/improvements. >>>> >>>> I would like to release 5.16.2 and 5.15.15 to keep our release pace and >>>> also to have CVE upgrade done. >>>> I will work on this during the week end. I would like to submit 5.15.15 >>>> beginning on next week and 5.16.2 end of next week. >>>> >>>> No objection ? >>> >>> Sounds good. >>> >>> Can you ensure whatever process you are following adapts to avoid the >>> unexpected mismatch in published artifacts reported previously: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb56983b47d0455805209434319aac655393ba48df6a7f9df93e16957%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E >>> >>>> >>>> On the other hand, I resume my work on the main branch (5.17.x): >>>> — test stability improvement (action plan proposed in another thread) >>>> — leveldb cleanup (PR will be updated soon, I’m running all tests now on >>>> my machines) >>>> — JDK11 full upgrade (adding JAXB required dependencies, and other change >>>> on the build) >>>> — Spring 5.3.x upgrade >>>> — Log4J2 upgrade >>>> I need at least a couple of weeks to have all done. >>>> >>>> Maybe we can define 5.15.15 as the last release on the 5.15.x series and >>>> focus 5.16.x (and 5.17.x). Thoughts ? >>> >>> I suggested retiring 5.15.x in January as it just makes sense to me >>> given the similarities between them, and also concentrating any future >>> JDK8-supporting efforts down to one stream. Noone argued otherwise >>> then, so sounds like a plan to me. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>
