Nice ! Thanks for the update ! Regards JB
> Le 16 mars 2021 à 19:08, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I was originally going to begin the rename process for Qpid tomorrow, > but in the past week I have either done or been on the receiving end > of some GitHub-based renames elsewhere which gave a nicer end result > than pushing a new branch and updating the default would. > > Knowing that it is an option to push to the Apache GitHub repos I had > a chat with Infra about whether it might actually be possible for them > to use the GitHub renaming tooling for this, as its just a nicer end > state for everyone. Infra said it isnt something they have done before > but would look into it, and could possibly try it out on the Qpid > repos. > > You might want to hold off on the ActiveMQ repo changes a little to > see what the outcome of that is. > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 15:34, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Thanks a lot, I have everything I need now >> >> I plan to work on this next week.. I will follow up with progress as I >> go over this thread. >> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:24 AM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Yep, thats the only config we have for the website auto build, which >>> is a standard build. Essentially we just enable it and tell it which >>> branch to build changes from (the one matching whoami) and then the >>> target branch to commit and push any output updates to, where they are >>> then picked up from for the web servers. >>> >>> The build itself occurs on a Builtbot CI instance at >>> https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/7. A mail is sent on each build to >>> commits@, e.g the latest one is: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc14442fcfba8395bec5207f2c43b8dbde068f369fabe50de039509fc%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E >>> >>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 22:46, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The website actually uses Jekyll. The branch it uses is controlled via the >>>> .asf.yaml file [1]. More details about this are here [2]. >>>> >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/master/.asf.yaml >>>> [2] >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-JekyllCMS >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:42 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I see the website is the pelican system. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure how the AMQ5 is configured on Jenkins... that's the only >>>>> thing >>>>> I'm lost now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:31 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> That's right.. I will do it for all the Branches... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point now I'm looking to what I would need to change on ci-builds >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm looking on ci-builds for things we would need to change.. >>>>>> >>>>>> however I don't understand how ActiveMQ5 is configured here: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I could find the simple configuration on artemis, but AMQ5 is using >>>>>> some fancy configuration that I don't know where it's taking it from. >>>>>> >>>>>> @Jb or anyone can you give me some pointers here? I'm really curious >>>>>> now.. (I know you could say you would change it. .but at this point >>>>>> I'm trying to understand what is going on :) ) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Also: where is the build for the website? I can't find it on >>>>>> ci-builds.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That’s my guess as well ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 9 mars 2021 à 08:57, michael.andre.pearce < >>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent from >>>>> my >>>>>> Galaxy >>>>>>>> -------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic < >>>>>> [email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021 14:33 (GMT+00:00) To: >>>>>> [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main >>>>> We >>>>>> will have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make >>>>> theswitch >>>>>> on GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < >>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why >>>>>> better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin >>>>>> Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub >>>>>> repos just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's >>>>> infrastructure? >>>>>> I know when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If >>>>> the >>>>>> GitHub repo is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the branch on >>>>>> Apache first? I'm not real clear on all the> > details of how the >>>>>> integration works so maybe that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, >>>>> Mar >>>>>> 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >> >>>>>> GitHub solved the PR move if the rename is done via their UI:> >>> >> >>>>>> https://github.com/github/renaming <https://github.com/github/renaming>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic < >>>>>> [email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>> Good point.> >>>> >>> >>>>>> I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In artemis you could >>>>> use >>>>>> the scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM >>>>>> Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no problem. >>>>>> Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >> >>>>>> [email protected]>> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to >>>>>> propose to rename all of our git branches as main on> >>>>> all of our >>>>>> branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on> >>>>> renaming >>>>>> offensive language from our codebases.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow some >>>>>> time before we do that, say 7 days after we> decide> >>>>> to take the >>>>>> move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if >>>>>> anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a> >>>>> >>>>>> downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could keep the master >>>>> for >>>>>> some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>> remove it later.> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic
