+1 (Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------From: Christopher Shannon
<[email protected]> Date: 21/04/2021 15:04 (GMT+00:00) To:
[email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release
(take #3) +1, everything looks good to me.On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:09 AM
Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]>wrote:> Hi,>> Thanks, just commented on
the PR: I already had quite the same fix ready> (as I said previously on this
thread).>> I revert my local change to take yours.>> Regards> JB>> > Le 20 avr.
2021 à 21:05, Jonathan Gallimore <> [email protected]> a écrit :> >>
> I opened a PR for AMQ-8220: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/650.> >>
> Tested with Java 11 and 16 on Mac. Will also test on Windows with the> same.>
>> > Jon> >> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon <> >
[email protected]> wrote:> >> >> I think just AMQ-8220 which if
not an easy fix I think could wait until> >> 5.16.3 so we can get it out.> >>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore <> >>
[email protected]> wrote:> >>> >>> Is there anything blocking a
5.16.2 release that anyone could help out> >>> with? Happy to try and help.>
>>>> >>> Jon> >>>> >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon <>
>>> [email protected]> wrote:> >>>> >>>> Just to clarify, I'm not
saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I> think> >>>> it's ok to have both.
Doing the releases simultaneously and> announcing> >>>> together makes sense to
me and I will happily vote +1 on both if> >>> everything> >>>> checks out. I
just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at> >> this> >>>> point and
do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously.> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon <> >>>>
[email protected]> wrote:> >>>>> >>>>> I will -1 this unless a
5.16.2 vote is also started shortly.> >>>>>> >>>>> We have now had numerous
discussions about why 5.16.2 should be> >>> released> >>>>> first and you have
agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions.> >>>> Robbie> >>>>> has made
this point several times. The reason we did not do it before> >>>> was a> >>>>>
blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support> >>> is>
>>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can> >>
just> >>>> be> >>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2.> >>>>>> >>>>> The priority
for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x> >>>>> branch.> >>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <> >>
[email protected]>> >>>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone,> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I
submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We> >>> fixed>
>>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on> >>>
5.15.15> >>>>>> release.> >>>>>>> >>>>>> This release includes important fixes
and updates, especially:> >>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades>
>>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains +> >>>>>> - fixes
and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking> >> Karaf> >>>>>> http
commands and refresh> >>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact
on xstream ack> >>>>>> processing> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a look on the
Release Notes for details:> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The Maven staging repository
is:> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>>>>>> <> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The dist staging repository is:> >>>>>>
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ <> >>>>>>
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> Git tag:> >>>>>> activemq-5.15.15> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote to approve
this release:> >>>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't
approve the release (please provide specific comments)> >>>>>>> >>>>>> This
vote will be open for at least 72 hours.> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks !> >>>>>>
Regards> >>>>>> JB> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>
