I wasn't sure what you were referring on that PR.... I thought you
still needed changes on the large message processing...


As for the dead code.. at some point I was reading the messages from
disk during reload of the journal. I then changed and I always have
the first packet on memory and I use that one to parse properties and
annotations.

For converters... on AMQPLargeMessage.toCore() I will use the same
method used to deliver a large message (the Deliverer Context).. so
those dead code were forgotten there and not needed... there's nothing
to be done in that case.

I thought I already mentioned that in the PR.

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 4:13 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Revert what exactly? Reverting the PR this was raised on wouldn't
> actually change anything, since the apparent issue isnt to do with the
> changes made in the PR (other than it removed the dead code that looks
> like it shouldnt be dead, since the buffer it opened/closed is still
> referenced). Its some earlier change that must have made it the way it
> is.
>
> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 22:43, Clebert Suconic
> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If the large message delivering in AMQP still an issue, I would rather
> > just revert the whole thing and keep the way it was before.. I thought
> > it was a simple change.
> > I'm addressing another issue I'm working on.. and I won't be able to
> > look into that
> >
> >
> > @Franz / @Robbie Gemmell  ?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:37 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I this also still needs looked at:
> > >
> > > > I also think the issue noted in these comments should be investigated
> > > > before another release occurs:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3711#issuecomment-913981275
> > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3711#issuecomment-914286613
> > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3711#discussion_r699397216
> > > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 23:50, Clebert Suconic
> > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have merged the change on the mirror / paging fix....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Before I release though I need to remove the CLI input I added.. some
> > > > people complained about the retention input I asked during the
> > > > create.. (some users were saying their scripts were broken)...
> > > > although we have the --silent for such cases.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 10:51 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm doing a retry on the same thread as the depage executor.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am finishing a test I'm writing and I will send the PR tomorrow 
> > > > > (Friday)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:46 PM Robbie Gemmell 
> > > > > <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I left some mostly trivial feedback on another PR merged yesterday,
> > > > > > #3728, but there is one comment I think also needs looked at first:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3728#discussion_r705417703
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 15:26, Clebert Suconic 
> > > > > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let’s postpone until Monday while we investigate these.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 9:01 AM Robbie Gemmell 
> > > > > > > <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Franz believes he found the issue, side effects from an earlier 
> > > > > > > > change
> > > > > > > > made months ago being hit now, exposed by use of the affected 
> > > > > > > > method
> > > > > > > > in recent changes.
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3465
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3731
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I also think the issue noted in these comments should be 
> > > > > > > > investigated
> > > > > > > > before another release occurs:
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3711#issuecomment-913981275
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3711#issuecomment-914286613
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3711#discussion_r699397216
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 12:57, Robbie Gemmell 
> > > > > > > > <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Changes made on main recently (perhaps yesterday) look to 
> > > > > > > > > have rather
> > > > > > > > > broken some things on expanded test runs (i.e not the push/PR 
> > > > > > > > > subset),
> > > > > > > > > so that needs to be resolved first.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 22:48, Clebert Suconic 
> > > > > > > > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Any problem if I did the release tomorrow?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Anyone wants to include anything extra ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:10 PM Clebert Suconic <
> > > > > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I would like to do a 2.19.0 release around Aug-30th.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please help me out on merging stuff required before then.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > if there's something (JIRA or PR)  you would really like 
> > > > > > > > > > > to include
> > > > > > > > > > > please mention it here.. (Last time someone mentioned me 
> > > > > > > > > > > on the PR I
> > > > > > > > > > > missed the notification).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to