+1 (non-binding)

I checked things over as follows:
- Verified the signature + checksum files.
- Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files in the archives.
- Checked licence headers in the source archive by running:
  "mvn apache-rat:check"
- Ran the Qpid JMS main HelloWorld against the broker from the binary archive.
- Ran the source build and the AMQP integration tests on JDK11 with:
  "mvn clean install -DskipTests && cd tests/integration-tests/ && mvn
-Ptests -Dtest=org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.amqp.**
test"

Robbie

On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 21:32, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0 release.
>
> We added these new features as part of 2.21.0:
>
> [ARTEMIS-3522] - Implement performance tools to evaluate throughput
> and Response Under Load performance of Artemis
> [ARTEMIS-3638] - MQTT 5
> [ARTEMIS-3670] - Diverting to multiple addresses
> [ARTEMIS-3685] - Reloading bridges
> [ARTEMIS-3686] - Example integrating OpenTelemetry
> [ARTEMIS-3720] - Max number of messages as a deciding factor for Paging
>
>
> The complete release notes can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12351083&styleName=Text&projectId=12315920
>
> The git commit report is here:
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.21.0
>
> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.21.0/
>
> The maven repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1249
>
> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
>
>
> The source tag:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.21.0
>
>
> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve this release
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here's my +1 (binding)

Reply via email to