While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe give other folks more of chance to reply...or at least use lay concensus style 'ill do it at <date> if noone objects' :)
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 17:48, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I will go ahead and remove it... > > > to be honest I don't believe much in rest from JMS due to the session > and stateful nature. > > > But if we were to provide REST for our users, I would rather bring the > servlet from AMQ5. it would be a major task anyway... and this > module has to go for sure. > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > It has looked to be rotting for a long time, and requires various user > > hoop jumping I dont expect many/any folks are interested in doing....I > > think removing it makes sense. > > > > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been > > > abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is > > > a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not > > > functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't > > > use it... (favoring stomp instead). > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/artemis-rest > > > > > > > > > As part of new logging changes, we are moving activemq-artemis into 3.0... > > > > > > At this point I see no other choice than remove the module. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
