I will go ahead and remove it...
I will also bump upstream/main as 3.0 as part of the removal. On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:24 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I didn’t meant to imply I was going to remove it now > > I intend to do it on Monday. If no objection. > > > Although keeping it means we would have to fix it. I honestly don’t see > many options to keep it. > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:09 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe give other folks more of chance >> to reply...or at least use lay concensus style 'ill do it at <date> if >> noone objects' :) >> >> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 17:48, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > I will go ahead and remove it... >> > >> > >> > to be honest I don't believe much in rest from JMS due to the session >> > and stateful nature. >> > >> > >> > But if we were to provide REST for our users, I would rather bring the >> > servlet from AMQ5. it would be a major task anyway... and this >> > module has to go for sure. >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > It has looked to be rotting for a long time, and requires various user >> > > hoop jumping I dont expect many/any folks are interested in doing....I >> > > think removing it makes sense. >> > > >> > > On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic >> > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been >> > > > abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is >> > > > a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not >> > > > functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't >> > > > use it... (favoring stomp instead). >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/artemis-rest >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > As part of new logging changes, we are moving activemq-artemis into >> > > > 3.0... >> > > > >> > > > At this point I see no other choice than remove the module. >> > > > >> > > > Any objections? >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Clebert Suconic >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Clebert Suconic > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
