The ActiveMQ Artemis Rest module itself is being pretty much abandonware and no one wants to fix it...
To fix it we would need to bring a few versions up to date.. and make some improvements on the module. People can still use the Rest from any previous download of artemis. Just bring the WAR from a previous version... I will add a note on the release notes on how to do it... And I'm not against fixing it and keeping it.. as long as it become active and fixed.... but I don't see anyone stepping up for it... On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:57 PM Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I may be a bit ignorant here (not a java dev), but how changing the logging > framework may justify and imply removing the whole functional module? > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:55 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > We can put a release notes on how to bring the rest from a previous > > version and still install in the current release... noticing this > > won't be supported in future releases. > > > > > > > > And if you prefer to keep the module, just update the module and bring > > it back please. This release should progress I think. @Justin would > > you consider changing it to +1? > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:44 PM Clebert Suconic > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > if you want to keep that Rest, please fix it (update jboss-rest) and > > > then move it back. > > > > > > > > > Especially we are removing jboss-logging, and that rest implementation > > > is strongly dependent on jboss-logging. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:07 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > -1 (binding) > > > > > > > > I just responded on the [DISCUSS] thread about removing the REST > > interface. > > > > As far as I can tell the REST interface is perfectly functional. I > > think we > > > > should deprecate it and update the documentation with an explanation > > before > > > > removing it completely. > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 3:34 PM Clebert Suconic < > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We removed ActiveMQ Artemis Rest, (which was already non functional) > > > > > as part of this release. > > > > > And other improvements and bug fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The release notes can be found here: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12352297&projectId=12315920 > > > > > > > > > > Ths git commit report is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.26.0 > > > > > > > > > > Source and binary distributions: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.26.0 > > > > > > > > > > The Maven repository is here: > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1262 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html > > > > > > > > > > The source tag is 2.26.0 on git, commit > > > > > 2d7b1a3ef7613dab68aeeb667f5b5eca37743b94: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/releases/tag/2.26.0 > > > > > > > > > > The source tag: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/ > > > > > <version> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will update the website after the vote has passed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve this release > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 Binding vote > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > -- Clebert Suconic
