I think that's fair.

+1


Justin

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:58 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am following up with an item that will be part of the document
> upload on the release notes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4229
>
>
>
> Rest as I said it's a maven dependency. There's no point in keeping it
> as it can be accessed from a previous maven repository.
>
>
> @Justin Bertram If you can move your vote to +1 based on this, I would
> appreciate it.. but I think we are still proceeding with the release.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 3:49 PM Clebert Suconic
> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > and it turns out activeMQ Artemis Rest is not part of the
> > distribution... (I don't think it's ever been).
> >
> > it's a component that you consume from maven and you have to create
> > your own war with your dependency.
> >
> >
> > in these terms the current REST would work as is as long as you use it
> > from a previous version...
> >
> >
> >
> > I will update the release notes with instructions on how to use Rest
> > from a previous version.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 3:16 PM Clebert Suconic
> > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The ActiveMQ Artemis Rest module itself is being pretty much
> > > abandonware and no one wants to fix it...
> > >
> > > To fix it we would need to bring a few versions up to date.. and make
> > > some improvements on the module.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > People can still use the Rest from any previous download of artemis.
> > > Just bring the WAR from a previous version...
> > >
> > >
> > > I will add a note on the release notes on how to do it...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > And I'm not against fixing it and keeping it.. as long as it become
> > > active and fixed.... but I don't see anyone stepping up for it...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:57 PM Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I may be a bit ignorant here (not a java dev), but how changing the
> logging
> > > > framework may justify and imply removing the whole functional module?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:55 PM Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We can put a release notes on how to bring the rest from a previous
> > > > > version and still install in the current release... noticing this
> > > > > won't be supported in future releases.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And if you prefer to keep the module, just update the module and
> bring
> > > > > it back please.  This release should progress I think. @Justin
> would
> > > > > you consider changing it to +1?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:44 PM Clebert Suconic
> > > > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you want to keep that Rest, please fix it (update jboss-rest)
> and
> > > > > > then move it back.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Especially we are removing jboss-logging, and that rest
> implementation
> > > > > > is strongly dependent on jboss-logging.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:07 PM Justin Bertram <
> jbert...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just responded on the [DISCUSS] thread about removing the
> REST
> > > > > interface.
> > > > > > > As far as I can tell the REST interface is perfectly
> functional. I
> > > > > think we
> > > > > > > should deprecate it and update the documentation with an
> explanation
> > > > > before
> > > > > > > removing it completely.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Justin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 3:34 PM Clebert Suconic <
> > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0
> release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We removed ActiveMQ Artemis Rest, (which was already non
> functional)
> > > > > > > > as part of this release.
> > > > > > > > And other improvements and bug fixes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The release notes can be found here:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12352297&projectId=12315920
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ths git commit report is here:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.26.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Source and binary distributions:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.26.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Maven repository is here:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1262
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on
> examples:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The source tag is 2.26.0 on git, commit
> > > > > > > > 2d7b1a3ef7613dab68aeeb667f5b5eca37743b94:
> > > > > > > >
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/releases/tag/2.26.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The source tag:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/
> > > > > > > > <version>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve this release
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here is my +1 Binding vote
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Clebert Suconic
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
>

Reply via email to