Just an update... I did some work on this again...
and instead of using sonatype, it would be easy enough to use github maven packaging... and this is working like a charm actually: https://github.com/d-leak I am writing tests that are validating JVMInterface jvmti = new JVMTIInterface(); Assert.assertEquals(0, jvmti.getAllObjects("packageName.ServerConnection").length); If someone ever forget to clear a reference again, this test will catch that... I hope more someone else will make use of this, because it feels cool :) On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 6:25 PM Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> wrote: > > Yeah, Sontatype OSSRH is a little involved to get going, but not too bad. > I use it (for example > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.artnaseef/correlation-id-utils). > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 4:20 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > You can release stuff to Maven Central via Sonatype OSSRH, > > https://central.sonatype.org/publish/publish-guide/ > > > > For example by using your GitHub Pages details for the groupid > > coordinates i.e. io.github.your-id, among other options: > > > > https://central.sonatype.org/publish/requirements/coordinates/#supported-code-hosting-services-for-personal-groupid > > > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 at 10:10, Domenico Francesco Bruscino > > <bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > JitPack is free for open-source projects and it doesn't require > > > authentication to download artifacts, see https://jitpack.io/ > > > > > > Another free alternative for open-source projects is GitHub Packages but > > it > > > requires authentication, see > > > > > https://docs.github.com/en/packages/working-with-a-github-packages-registry/working-with-the-apache-maven-registry > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 at 17:15, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > getAllReachableObjects is somewhat easy to implement in C. > > > > > > > > I will try to pursue my own implementation.. and if we fail we have a > > > > failback on the jetbrains route. > > > > > > > > > > > > there are some reporting things I'm doing to show where are eventual > > leaks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I worked on a test with Justin, and we asserted noObjects in the heap > > > > and it worked like a charm. > > > > > > > > > > > > I just need to find a way to deploy a maven repo somewhere. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 11:13 AM Jiri Daněk <jda...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 4:00 PM Clebert Suconic < > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > There are of course tools that would been written before. I have > > not > > > > > > seen anything that would be as simple as I'm proposing (with the > > > > > > exception of the .NET where you can get a list of objects). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes! It is weird that C#, Python, JavaScript, all have a simple way > > to > > > > list > > > > > heap objects, only in Java it seems soo hard to do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I'm doing is based on the JBoss Profiler that I wrote many > > years > > > > > > ago (and I left it rotten and dead)... so this would revive the > > simple > > > > > > parts just for the JUnit Tests. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I linked it in my previous mail. I was thinking that the code > > looks > > > > > somewhat similar, except it's in C and not C++... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You just get a simple list of Objects before and later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the criticism to JMVTI.. I have it already written, > > besides > > > > > > any tooling around Java and Debugging will require C dev... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the project itself already exists.. and I think it's viable. I am > > > > > > looking for options to host it, while you seem to be looking for > > > > > > counter arguments for having it done? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm just writing up the results of my explorations. Initially I > > hoped to > > > > > learn what is possible. Best case would be I found something that's > > > > already > > > > > written and hosted, and that does not include native code (think all > > > > those > > > > > possible build/compatibility issues).... that did not really > > happen... > > > > > > > > > > Some tests can be written using the weakref approach, but that has > > > > limited > > > > > use for only specific scenarios. The dumping and reading of hprof > > file > > > > > might work, but I did not find a good Java implementation (Shark is > > in > > > > > Kotlin). The jetbrains JVMTI library looks reasonable, on a first > > sight, > > > > > though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you give me an alternative in Java where i can do > > > > > > jvmti.getallObject(clazz); and eventually list the references for > > it.. > > > > > > perhaps I could just use that option instead. Such thing will be > > > > > > written in C anyways. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/JetBrains/debugger-memory-agent > > > > > > > > > > MemoryAgent ma = MemoryAgent.get(); > > > > > if (ma == null) { /* handle failure to load */ } > > > > > ma.getAllReachableObjects(null, clazz); > > > > > -- > > > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards > > > > > Jiri Daněk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > -- Clebert Suconic
