Hi Clebert,
My concern was about the maintainability of the community for upgrading
the stack for mainly critical issues, cve...but not for improvement.
I was thinking about the community support but not the companies support.
regards,
François
On 21/12/2023 22:09, Clebert Suconic wrote:
The term LTS implies support though. (Long Term *SUPPORT*). I would be
careful with that terminology.
there are a few companies offering support to ActiveMQ.
The terminology used here was more an overload to a stable branch, or
it was actually meant on the "support" side?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi Matt,
I think it's what I proposed: 5.18.x should be our LTS branch currently.
Regards
JB
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:19 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey JB-
+1 I agree, formalizing and communicating LTS is important to users.
However, I think we should have a *released* branch that we feel is solid to
base LTS off of vs declaring a future unreleased branch as a LTS release.
-Matt
On Dec 21, 2023, at 3:29 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi François,
We discussed LTS/EOA but without commitment yet.
The thing we agreed on is to maintain 3 branches active (so 6.0.x,
5.18.x, 5.17.x right now). The same as we do in Apache Karaf
basically. I would consider it a kind of informal LTS :)
If we need to have a concrete LTS plan, then 5.18.x would be LTS but not 6.0.x.
In terms of roadmap, we have basically:
- 6.1.x plan to include new JMS features support
- 6.x (6.2.x, 6.3.x, etc) will follow the same path with new JMS
features support
- 7.x will be a big milestone because we plan to remove Spring
(supporting new configuration format like activemq,xml, activemq,yaml,
activemq.json, etc), add new tools, etc
If there are no objections, I can start a formal vote for LTS policy
and if the vote passes I can update the website.
Regards
JB
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:04 AM Francois Papon
<francois.pa...@openobject.fr> wrote:
Hi all,
Now that the current release is on 6.x, I am searching for LTS
informations about the 5.x version but I cannot find it on the website.
Is there some info about this topic?
regards,
François
