Hey Justin,

Here are the answers:
- Are all the bridges configured the same way? How exactly are they
configured?
Yes, they are configured the same way.
The CoreBridge configuration is attached to
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VEwj1MoB2tbcCp8R4XeQTzi80Q0dQ606/view?usp=sharing

- Is the bridge target available when you see this increase happen?
The bridges are connected from the client side to the server (with the 2.38
Artemis version)
- Are the bridges actually moving messages when you see the increase or
are they idle?
Most of the time, messages are idle.
- Are 3,500 bridges actually required to trigger the increase? Do you, for
example, not see the increase if you use 3,000 bridges? What about 1,000 or
100?
We tested with 3500 CoreBridges in the development environment, and I
should ask for permission to close some connections.
If you require it, I would ask for that kind of permission.

Thanks,
Dragan

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:43 PM Dragan J <draga...@flipside.team> wrote:

> Can you access the screenshots?
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 10:18 AM Dragan J <draga...@flipside.team> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, a typo. It's 3,500 CoreBridges
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 10:14 AM Dragan J <draga...@flipside.team> wrote:
>>
>>> @Justin The broker (version 2.38) communicates with other brokers
>>> (version 2.37) through 35,000 CoreBridges. There was minimal message
>>> exchange between them.
>>> Please find the two graphs (from earlier) attached on my Google Drive.
>>> Please let me know if you have an alternative way to share files.
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gy8XQi153Fi5Zm9gUdsP_co8fSuh1HjL/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_Fbg8OmWhlsOKfalfIEwKxGIl97a1kQ5/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> @Arthur When I tried to perform a GC from JConsole I got the following:
>>>
>>> Exception in thread "MemoryPanel.gc" java.lang.SecurityException: User
>>> not authorized to access operation: gc
>>>
>>

Reply via email to