Hi Colm- It would help if you test this change out (replace commons-lang3 with built-in function):
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1469 Thanks, Matt > On Sep 5, 2025, at 9:58 AM, Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Colm- > > I think that is essential the plan for ActiveMQ 6.2.0. Are you seeing other? > > The upgrade work for Jetty 12 is almost done — check PR here: > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1344 > > Thanks, > Matt > >> On Sep 5, 2025, at 3:47 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It's increasingly a problem that the only ActiveMQ classic releases >> available use EOL libraries (Spring 6.1, Jetty 11), in terms of running CVEs >> in production. I'd like to respectfully request that the focus is on >> updating to Jetty 12 and releasing, rather than delaying AMQ 6.2.0 for other >> features. I'm happy to help out with dependency updates, testing etc. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Colm. >> >> On 2025/08/08 13:20:20 Matt Pavlovich wrote: >>> For 6.2.0 I propose merging the Virtual Thread tech preview feature and >>> move to Jetty 12. >>> >>> The Jetty 12 PR is ~80% complete. >>> >>> Matt Pavlovich >>> >>>> On Aug 7, 2025, at 5:38 PM, Christopher Shannon >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> JB, >>>> >>>> Sorry for the delayed response, I think the time frame for a 6.1.8 release >>>> is fine. >>>> >>>> For 6.2.0 that timeline seems ok assuming it's ready by that date, I would >>>> need to go back and look at the proposals for the new Jakarta features, but >>>> is there any particular one you had in mind to include? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I propose: >>>>> 1. ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.8 by end of August/beginning of September, as >>>>> a maintenance release, containing several fixes and dependency updates >>>>> 2. ActiveMQ Classic 6.2.0 by end of October/beginning of November. The >>>>> purpose here is to add at least one new feature to support Jakarta >>>>> Messaging 3.x. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> In the meantime, I'm working on a prototype for ActiveMQ Classic 7.x, >>>>> removing Spring dependency and using service discovery mechanism (for >>>>> destination policies, transport connectors, etc). Also I'm resuming >>>>> the investigation about replicated KahaDB. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact >> >> >
