Hi JB-

I don’t think Jetty 12 will be ready then, since we should not rush it and risk 
a security issue with the web layer. Perhaps we target 6.3.0 for October with 
Jetty 12?

I plan to merge Virtual Thread experimental support and other minor clean-up 
PRs for 6.2.0.

Bigger changes, such as SSLContext-migrate-from-ThreadLocal will wait for 6.3.x 
or 6.4.x.

Thanks,
Matt

> On Sep 16, 2025, at 6:45 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Regarding important dependencies updates (spring, common, ...), and
> timing, I propose to move "faster" on the ActiveMQ 6.2.0 release.
> 
> What about submitting to vote both 6.1.8 and 6.2.0 by the end of this
> week/beginning of next week ?
> 
> I will tackle PRs for 6.2.0 now that I'm back from CommuntyOverCode.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 4:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> FYI, I'm opening several PRs to start the 6.2.0 release prep.
>> 
>> I will keep you posted.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> It's a good comment Colm and that's exactly the proposal about
>>> ActiveMQ 6.2.0 release.
>>> The purposes of ActiveMQ 6.2.0 are:
>>> 1. Bump "major" dependency version (Spring, Jetty, etc)
>>> 2. Include new Jakarta Messaging 3.1 features
>>> 
>>> So we are on the same page here.
>>> 
>>> I proposed 6.2.0 for October, and I think we are on track. Matt worked
>>> on Jetty 12 update, and I will help on that.
>>> For the other major version bumps, it's almost done.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 10:47 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> It's increasingly a problem that the only ActiveMQ classic releases 
>>>> available use EOL libraries (Spring 6.1, Jetty 11), in terms of running 
>>>> CVEs in production. I'd like to respectfully request that the focus is on 
>>>> updating to Jetty 12 and releasing, rather than delaying AMQ 6.2.0 for 
>>>> other features. I'm happy to help out with dependency updates, testing etc.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Colm.
>>>> 
>>>> On 2025/08/08 13:20:20 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>>>>> For 6.2.0 I propose merging the Virtual Thread tech preview feature and 
>>>>> move to Jetty 12.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Jetty 12 PR is ~80% complete.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Matt Pavlovich
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 7, 2025, at 5:38 PM, Christopher Shannon 
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> JB,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry for the delayed response, I think the time frame for a 6.1.8 
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> is fine.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For 6.2.0 that timeline seems ok assuming it's ready by that date, I 
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> need to go back and look at the proposals for the new Jakarta features, 
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> is there any particular one you had in mind to include?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I propose:
>>>>>>> 1. ActiveMQ Classic 6.1.8 by end of August/beginning of September, as
>>>>>>> a maintenance release, containing several fixes and dependency updates
>>>>>>> 2. ActiveMQ Classic 6.2.0 by end of October/beginning of November. The
>>>>>>> purpose here is to add at least one new feature to support Jakarta
>>>>>>> Messaging 3.x.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thoughts ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In the meantime, I'm working on a prototype for ActiveMQ Classic 7.x,
>>>>>>> removing Spring dependency and using service discovery mechanism (for
>>>>>>> destination policies, transport connectors, etc). Also I'm resuming
>>>>>>> the investigation about replicated KahaDB.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>>>> 
>>>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to