+1 I think building admin APIs for ActiveMQ Classic and then moving the web console to a separate repo is a good idea. Furthermore, by having the admin APIs it unlocks other opportunities such as MCP server for operating the broker.
Thanks, Ken On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 8:22 AM Endre Stølsvik <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, but I just have to drive-by comment on this: > I would really suggest just making it out of JS/HTML/CSS, not using any > frameworks at all. A full-on "SPA-alike" NPM+Node-built webapp should at > least definitely not be done, IMHO. > > Kind regards, > Endre Stølsvik > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 5:04 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I am in favor of an improvement in a new web console for out-of-the-box > > experience for ActiveMQ. I think an easier first pass is a re-skin and > > remove of Spring Web/MVC from the dependency chain. > > > > I’m not generally in favor of hosting a Javascript-based web console, > > since the ecosystem is riddled with issues and constant overhaul, but I > > would be -0 on if others wish to tackle it. > > > > Regarding using Hawtio: -1 > > > > Matt Pavlovich > > > > > On Sep 17, 2025, at 5:26 AM, Andy Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > If you are looking to use Jolokia have you thought of using HawtIO? > This > > is > > > what the Artemis console is built on, it would be pretty easy to > > > bootstrap something and you get a lot out of the box for free such as > > > Authentication etc. Just an idea! > > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > On Wed, 17 Sept 2025 at 06:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi folks, > > >> > > >> I started to write a new web console for ActiveMQ Classic, powered by > > >> reactjs and ant.design. > > >> > > >> More than a more "modern/professional" look'n feel, the purpose is > also > > to: > > >> 1. Be able to manage multiple brokers in one console > > >> 2. Have the web console decoupled from the brokers (interesting for > > >> Kubernetes deployment) > > >> 3 Integrate with Jolokia (instead of directly JMX) > > >> > > >> I would like to propose this for ActiveMQ Classic 7, removing the > > >> current webconsole (also removing the spring controller dependency, > > >> etc). > > >> > > >> Thoughts ? > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> JB > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > > > > > >
