At some point we had a previous conversation on this and Artemis took action on it, so we probably can just do what Artemis had done. I would have to go find the previous thread.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3474 On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 1:10 PM Christopher Shannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > So I guess we can just move this to GH discussions then because it > will be emailed to the list? > > Matt, can you move the issue to a new GH discussion instead? > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 1:03 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I disagree: if it's a GitHub Discussion back on the dev mailing list, > > that's OK. > > But this issue is not appropriate here. > > > > It should be discussed on the mailing list. The issue should contain the > > call for action after the discussion on the mailing list. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 6:36 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Heads up— > > > > > > I created a GH issue to discuss modernizing the terminology. I believe the > > > discussion is too nuanced for the mailing list, so wanted to announce it > > > here and invite others to discuss and comment via the GH issue. > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/issues/1932 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Matt Pavlovich --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
