Conversion to discussion completed: https://github.com/apache/activemq/discussions/1933
> On Apr 15, 2026, at 12:39 PM, Christopher Shannon > <[email protected]> wrote: > > At some point we had a previous conversation on this and Artemis took > action on it, so we probably can just do what Artemis had done. I > would have to go find the previous thread. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3474 > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 1:10 PM Christopher Shannon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So I guess we can just move this to GH discussions then because it >> will be emailed to the list? >> >> Matt, can you move the issue to a new GH discussion instead? >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 1:03 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I disagree: if it's a GitHub Discussion back on the dev mailing list, >>> that's OK. >>> But this issue is not appropriate here. >>> >>> It should be discussed on the mailing list. The issue should contain the >>> call for action after the discussion on the mailing list. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 6:36 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Heads up— >>>> >>>> I created a GH issue to discuss modernizing the terminology. I believe the >>>> discussion is too nuanced for the mailing list, so wanted to announce it >>>> here and invite others to discuss and comment via the GH issue. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/issues/1932 >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Matt Pavlovich > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > >
