thomastthai commented on issue #2111: URL: https://github.com/apache/age/issues/2111#issuecomment-2642291371
@knutole, @jrgemignani's statement was clear. The team paid to work on AGE was let go — most likely because funding ran out or shifted to other priorities. Whatever the reason, he summarized the future direction below: > Currently, there isn't an eta for, nor a roadmap to, an Apache AGE version for PG17 **or any continuing support**. Paid work for an open source can accelerate a project until the money, passion, or time runs out. It sucks, as AGE is one of the more exciting projects for PostgreSQL. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@age.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
